Not to hijack this thread, but why do some test labs setup the Field Probe in
the chamber next to the EUT during the test?  The measurement with the EUT in
the field should be all over the place and would have little value. Am I
missing something or are some labs leveling off the Field Probe during
testing?  

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ian White (UK)
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:00 AM
To: IEEE Forum ([email protected])
Subject: BS EN61000-4-3 and calibrated fields.

 

Could you please  help:

 

Could you explain what is  the correct procedure when using an anechoic
chamber which is  calibrated and operating to EN61000-4-3.

 

During calibration of the chamber,   a calibration file is made and it is
assessed according to the guidelines laid down under BS EN61000-4-3. During
calibration the chamber is empty.

 

During a normal test run a UUT is put into the chamber. The questions is :

 

a)      Do you use the calibration file as the starting point and adjust the
field strength which may have changed due to the UUT being in the chamber.

b)      Just take the calibration file and run it and except the filed
strengths would have changed due to the UUT being in the chamber.

 

 

Thanks

 

Ian White

Compliance and Reliability.

 

 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> 
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

________________________________


LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to