Dear Members,
 
Please help me to find out the compliance requirement in Mexico.  I did online
search.  Here is my search results:
 

Safety:

New NOM Regulations (NOM 016 for ITE and NOM 001 for A/V) starting August 17,
2010: safety NOM certificate or the certificate issued by Intertek (USA), TUV
(USA), UL (USA), CSA (Canada), Intertek (Canada), and UL (Canada).

Radio Equipment (802.11a/b/g/n and 802.15.4 equipment):

NOM-121-SCT1-2009 takes effect on August 21, 2010, in-country testing of one
sample to obtain Cofetel certificate

US and Mexico signed an MRA in May, 2011.  There is 18 months transition period

 

My questions are:

1. Please confirm a certificate issued by Intertek (USA), TUV (USA), UL (USA)
is acceptable and no additional work is required.

2. At this time, before the US-Mexica MRA takes effect, what is the conformity
assessment procedure for unintentional radiators?  Do they need to be tested
in Mexico?  Is there any certification or type approval procedure apply?

3. Same Item 2 questions for intentional radiators.

 

Thank you very much for your time and look forward to your help.

 

Best regards,

Grace Lin

 

PS: It seems we have to update the worldwide frequency power level list.  It
looks like NOM-121-SCT1-2009  is the appropriate regulation under
"Note-Mexico:". 

 

 

 
 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to