I understand the sentiment. What is often been billed as a leveling of the playing field also acts as a nontariff trade barrier.
If this were a customer requirement some extra effort might be cajoled, with appropriate agreements on parchment or velum and in ink or blood. In this case, I'm not convinced. Regards, Peter L. Tarver, PE > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 11:54 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PSES] ISO 9001 certificates > > Many of us little fish have no choice - we play the ISO > way, or we do not > get into a market. > > As you know, this is also endemic with certain NRTL > agency mark(s) for > components - you have 'their' mark on the device, or > you do not get to > submit it as part of the end-use construction. > > Brian This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, use, copy, disclose or distribute this message. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
