Yes, correct. I was using the wiring convention of line on left and neutral on
right for CEE7/7 stuff. My bad.

Would adoption of IEC60906-1 fix this? Do the various EU electric codes
require specific wiring for receptacles?

I will have to re-think the safety of a single mains fuse for use with
'Schuko' stuff.

Brian 

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of John
 > Woodgate
 > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:23 PM
 > To: [email protected]
 > Subject: Re: Line-Neutral orientation with auto-ranging 
 > power supplies
 >  
 > In message <[email protected]>, 
 > dated Tue, 
 > 22 Mar 2011, Brian O'Connell <[email protected]> writes:
 > 
 > >The component power supply, for Class I construction, is 
 > required to 
 > >have the mains input line and neutral terminals marked.
 > 
 > Even though it's ineffective in all those countries that use 
 > the Schuko 
 > or other reversible mains plug.
 > -- 
 > OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
 > John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
 > Plural: data, criteria, phenomena. Singular: datum 
 > (different meaning: use
 > 'data element' for a single item), criterion, phenomenon. 
 > 'Effect' is a noun,
 > 'affect' is a verb (except in psychiatry).

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to