Bill, Would appreciate more info. What part of the implementation was difficult?
Did it seem to work? What assumptions had to be made to use a site 'normalization' system? thanks, Brian -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Bill Owsley Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 2:30 PM To: Cody Miller; Scott Douglas Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Old EMC Software Called CASPR We took a test ride many years ago. Interesting concept, difficult to implement. The hardware was setup at a distance. It basically assumed near equal distribution of ambient fields which were then subtracted from actual readings of EUT on an OATS. The results being just what you wanted to measure in the first place. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
