Well in some cases the "imitation of real life operation"  in testing had
been given up if favor of reproducibility.
Anyway, an equipment of which the immunity performance depends on
its cable length...., well you know what I mean.

In general I support John Davies approach, but have to add
that the disturbance power test could well be replaced by
a conducted power test at then mains port, using a suitable CDN.
Most standard CDN's go to 230 MHz , upgrading to 300 MHz seems
no real problem. 
Since vacuum cleaners all have wireless internet now and
a hard disk for data logging, soon the conducted power
test need to be replaced
with a standard OATS/SAR/FAR type of  radiated emission test up to 5 GHz 
just as standard IT equipment.

Then all conducted test could standardize to 30 cm of cable length..



Regards,

Ing. Gert Gremmen



[email protected]
www.cetest.nl

Kiotoweg 363
3047 BG Rotterdam
T 31(0)104152426
F 31(0)104154953

 Before printing, think about the environment. 



-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens John Woodgate
Verzonden: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:10 AM
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] EUT power cord length

In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 9 Feb 
2011, "John Davies, Blackwood Labs" <[email protected]> 
writes:

>In my opinion the length shall always be as the standard dictates and 
>there are good justifications for the differing lengths in differing 
>standards (even though the standard in question may not explain, but 
>simply instruct).

But products with non-detachable cables don't have their length varied 
in the field according to which disturbance they are being exposed to. I 
can't see any justification for altering the length of a non-detachable 
cable. If its length magnifies or attenuates the disturbance, so be it, 
that is what happens in real life.

Consider the incongruity of testing, say, a vacuum cleaner with a 0.5 m 
cable.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Plural: data, criteria, phenomena. Singular: datum (different meaning: use
'data element' for a single item), criterion, phenomenon. 'Effect' is a noun,
'affect' is a verb (except in psychiatry).

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to