Derek, If certain gaps in the spectrum have limits removed, then it would stand to reason that someone might end up exploiting that fact. Even unintentional radiators might position internal operating frequencies or harmonics in those frequency gaps. When I first thought about it, it made some sense. Given *NO* limits in some gaps, however, then it becomes possible that a product could reek havoc with other products that are susceptible at those frequencies, so then the corresponding immunity tests would have to be changed. It is something worth thinking about. Bob R.
--- On Thu, 2/3/11, Derek Walton <[email protected]> wrote: From: Derek Walton <[email protected]> Subject: Re: EMC spectrum 'gaps' To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: Thursday, February 3, 2011, 2:40 PM Thanks Ghery, this is why I'm trying hard to ELIMINATE limits that serve no purpose. Anyone interested in contributing, feel free to contact me, off list if you feel more comfortable. Thanks, Derek Walton - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]>
