I don't want to re-invent the wheel, but I'm looking to find a simple way to communicate the idea that some systems don't need protection, others need protection, others need protection that will still protect even with a single-fault present anywhere, and so-on. Somewhere somebody must have codified this idea for example with type 0, type 1, type 2, etc. I'm sure there are standards out there for this - can anyone point me to one or more?
Thanks, Jim _______________________________________ _____________________________________________ Jim Eichner | Schneider Electric | Renewable Energies Business | CANADA | Compliance Engineering Manager Phone: +1-604-422-2546 | Mobile: +1-604-418-8472 Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | Site: www.schneider-electric.com/renewable-energies <http://www.schneider-electric.com/renewable-energies> | Address: 8999 Nelson Way, Burnaby, BC, V5A 4B5 *** Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]>
