There is no 'harmonization' here - UL1310 and CSA No.223 have no
applicability outside of North America; this is a national deviation for
U.S. and Canada. There are many IEC safety standards that address the
concept of an inherently limited power source, but none are required by
IEC60950-1. In any case, the requirements for an inherently limited power
source are specified in 2.5.

See annex P.2 of UL/CSA60950-1, where a power source that is required to
have limited voltage and limited power must meet the standards for a Class
2 power source in accordance with UL1310/CSA223.

My typical approach for my employer's Class 2 + Class II power converters
is to write the CB report using the 60950-1 TRF, and do the NRTL report to
address UL1310/CSA223.

If intended for North America only, 60950-1 is not required.

Mr. Stewardship Manager's fee for my professional advise is to fix the
MPS430 errata. Now.

Does one steward management, or does one manage stewardship ?

Brian 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Leber, Jody
(San Diego)
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:59 AM
To: Gartman, Richard; [email protected]
Subject: RE: UL1310 USB AC adapter

Dear Richard,

If you use UL 60950-1, the additional requirements for UL 1310 are already
considered.  Details are included in UL's Practical Application Guidelines
(PAG).  I believe the main rational for using UL 60950-1 over UL 1310 is
for international harmonization.

Best Regards,
 
Jody Leber
SGS Consumer Testing Services
Manager, Battery Test Certification Program

SGS - U. S. Testing Company, Inc.
16870 West Bernardo Drive, Suite 250
San Diego, CA 92127 USA
Phone: 678.469.9835
Fax:     858.592.7107
E-mail:  [email protected]
 

From: Gartman, Richard [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 7:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] UL1310 USB AC adapter

Looking for some observations regarding a USB AC adapter; 5V 1000mA
output, that would be sold in US/Canada.
 
I know many AC adapters are listed to UL60950 for ITE. What arguments
could me made to require UL1310 instead of just UL60950?
 
Thanks
W. Richard Gartman, MS, CSP
Product Stewardship Manager
Texas Instruments, Education Technology

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to