Hello Peter,

 

You do not need to update your DoC for every ECO.  Your DoC is your
declaration to the outside world that you declare your particular product (or
several model variations of products) compliant with the EC Directive.  If you
make a component change (or any other reason for your ECO), yet your model
number remains the same as stated on your current DoC, then a new DoC is
certainly not required.  You would, of course, need to record the effect of
the ECO in your technical file, which backs up the DoC and this is where your
control should concentrate (i.e. your “internal production control” under
the 2004/108/EC).

 

My one-day EMC Goggles training course addresses such issues relating to the
EMC Directive, amongst many other aspects of EMC, including a clear
understanding of the effects of interference, design for compliance and EMC
testing.  It’s a complete all-round course with many tips included from my
20 years spent working in EMC.

 

I am giving this course at San Jose, California, on Monday 18th October –
that’s just next week!

 

If anyone is interested in attending, or knows of someone within their
organisation who needs to be brought up to speed on EMC, please email me
separately.  There are a few places available.

 

Best Regards,

John

 

From: peterh...@aol.com [mailto:peterh...@aol.com] 
Sent: 11 October 2010 16:38
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Updating EU DoC

 

 

Hello group,

 

I am looking to see how you folks generate and update your EU DOC. We use the
typical MS Word template and every time there is a need for an update, we
update this document and have to go through ECO (Engineering Change Order)
since it is a controlled document and I found this process to be very time
consuming and not really efficient in particular when you have over 100 DOC's
to maintain. Is there any easier way? Is there an automated process out there?
Do we really need to have it under control revision?

 

Thank you

Peter

 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
believed to be clean. 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


Reply via email to