In message 
<2c0b573b18ce4443bd0a51b829393c10011c4...@de01exm73.ds.mot.com>, dated 
Fri, 2 May 2008, Luksich Mark-TXP763 <mark.luks...@motorola.com> writes:

>My solution was to hang a regulatory engineer in every development team 
>from day 1.  Then give the team a set of requirements in writing on day
>2.  With a follow on delivery of test data to regulatory on the second 
>set of protos.  This data rubs the teams nose in issues before they get 
>to a release version.

Quite right, too. As long as the regulatory guy isn't a prima donna. 
Some are.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Murphy's Law has now been officially re-named The Certainty Principle
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           emcp...@ptcnh.net
     Mike Cantwell           mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
     David Heald:            emc-p...@daveheald.com

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc




Reply via email to