The most common grounded plug type in China is the flat plug similar to the
Australian plug.  For Class II plugs (non-grounded), there is a plug
configuration very similar to the U.S. and Japanese two bladed plug. The
Chinese standards are GB 1002 and GB 2099.1 and it covers both configurations.
 I do not know if copies of the standards are readily available in English. 
Plugs, sockets and direct plug-in transformers must have CCC approval governed
by the rules of CQC.  However, other test agencies (such as UL and TÜV) are
authorized to test to CQC rules, and these agencies may be able to help you
with information regarding the exact details of the plug configuration.
http://www.ul-asia.com/cma/main/UL-CMA-main.html
http://www.int-app.tuv.com/country_details.asp?country=China
 
- Ted Eckert
"Bolintineanu, Constantin" <cbolintine...@tycoint.com> wrote:

        Dear Colleagues,
         
        I tried to find out on several channels information regarding the TYPE 
of
ACCEPTABLE PLUGS to be used within DIRECT PLUG-IN TRANSFORMERS placed on the
CHINESE MARKET. I was not able to find at least an answer.
         
        I searched on Internet and the results that I found are not relevant;
         
        I have the following questions:
         
        
        The RATINGS of that DIRECT PLUG-IN transformer are:
        PRIMARY 220-230V ac, SECONDARY 16Vac /20VA
        The QUESTIONS are:
        1. Which is the MOST COMMON PLUG CONFIGURATION IN CHINA ? (ROUND pins, 
OR
FLAT, or "Aus-asia" configuration )?
        DETAILS regarding this aspect (geometry, size, insulation, etc. will be 
very
much appreciated, INCLUDING the NAME of the APPLICABLE REGULATORY DOCUMENT
(Standard) that covers the DIRECT PLUG-IN TRANSFORMERS in China).
        2. IF there an English version of that Standard, please be so kind and 
advise
me from where we are able to buy it.
        3. Are there in China any Standards for the INPUT PLUGS ? (e.g.: in 
Australia
they have a specific Standard that covers Approval and test
specification-Plugs and socket-outlets, AS/NZS 3112:2004)
        4. Any available specification it will be very much appreciated if you 
can
share with me, pictures, links, etc.
        5. IS IT MANDATORY for a such DIRECT PLUG-IN TRANSFORMER to have the CCC
APPROVAL or not ?
        In my engineering judgement the answer is YES, but I received some 
feedback
that due to the OUTPUT (?!?) voltage (less than 35 Volts) it is not necessary
to be CCC Approved...??!?
        Your feedback and advises are very much appreciated.
        Respectfully yours,
        Constantin
        
        Constantin Bolintineanu P.Eng.
        TYCO SAFETY PRODUCTS CANADA
        3301 LANGSTAFF Road, L4K 4L2
        CONCORD, ONTARIO, CANADA
        e-mail: cbolintine...@tycoint.com
        Tel: 905 760 3000 ext 2568
        Fax: 905 760 3020
        
        DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use,
disseminate, distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any
way. If you received this e-mail message in error, please return the message
and its attachments to the sender, and then please delete from your system
without copying or forwarding it or call TSPC at 905 760 3000 extension 2568
so that the sender's address records can be corrected.
         

________________________________

        From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Aldous, 
Scott
        Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 10:44 AM
        To: Curt McNamara; ted.eck...@apcc.com
        Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
        Subject: RE: Safety regulations [text][heur][BCC][ffrom][spf]
        
        
        Curt writes:
         
        To phrase this another way: someone else's label (the power supply
manufacturer) is not a valid indicator that a product has a safety approval. 
         
        If I understand the original question correctly, this is what it really 
comes
down to. The power supply may be Listed by itself, but that does not mean that
the end product using it is then somehow covered by the power supply Listing,
even if no additional hazards are present in the end product outside the power
supply. If there is a requirement for the end product to be Listed, then it
must be evaluated separately. Allowing the power supply Listing mark to be
visible in the end product in such a way that the customer is led to believe
that this mark covers the end product is a no-no.
         
        Scott Aldous
        Compliance Engineer
        Advanced Energy
        Tel: 970-407-6872
        Fax: 970-407-5872
        
________________________________

        From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Curt 
McNamara
        Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 8:38 AM
        To: ted.eck...@apcc.com
        Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
        Subject: Re: Safety regulations
         
        Wow! The chart shows 2A at 45V for Class II, or 100VA as you note. This 
is a
lot of energy to me, and can certainly result in ignition given the correct
conditions. I note that the standard also shows voltages above SELV as
permissible. 
         
        The implication in the original question was information technology (as 
far
as I could tell). Even with approved supplies and only SELV levels safety
investigations are still required. 
         
        Some examples:
        Flammable material (the laptop plastic case).
        Fault (5V to ground) causes part to fall off board through vent hole,
igniting material on table.
         
        There are lots of ways to design unsafe products using only SELV (not 
even
considering Class II). If your product needs a safety approval then an
investigation is required.
         
        To phrase this another way: someone else's label (the power supply
manufacturer) is not a valid indicator that a product has a safety approval. 
         
                                                                                
     
                                          Curt
         
        in real life
        Curt McNamara, P.E. // principal electrical engineer
        Logic Product Development
        411 Washington Ave. N. Suite 400
        Minneapolis, MN 55401
        T // 612.436.5178
        F // 612.672.9489
        _www.logicpd.com <http://www.logicpd.com/> _
</exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.logicpd.com/>
         
        On May 2, 2008, at 7:24 AM, ted.eck...@apcc.com wrote:
        
        
        
        The output of a Class 2/LPS circuit does not have the voltage or energy 
to
        be a shock or ignition risk as long as that voltage is used without any
        changes.  I could design a circuit with an inverter and step-up 
transformer
        that would give me a hazardous voltage.  The Class 2 limit is 100 W.  In
        theory, I could get 1000 VAC RMS at 100 mA.  Even with losses due
        efficiency limits, there would be enough current to kill somebody.
        
        I will say that in general, if you are using a power supply that meets 
the
        60950 LPS or the NEC Class 2 limits (they are basically the same) then 
you
        can hang circuits off the output without problems.  However, it still 
needs
        to be investigated in a case by case basis.
        
        Ted Eckert
        APC-MGE
        http://www.apc.com/
        
        The items contained in this e-mail reflect the personal opinions of the
        writer and are only provided for the assistance of the reader. The 
writer
        is not speaking in an official capacity for APC-MGE or Schneider 
Electric.
        The speaker does not represent APC-MGE's or Schneider Electric's 
official
        position on any matter.
        
        
        
                    scott barrows                                               
  
                    <sbarrows9@yahoo.                                           
  
                    com>                                                       
To 
                    Sent by:                  Curt McNamara <mcnam...@umn.edu>, 
  
                    emc-p...@ieee.org         peter merguerian                  
  
                                              <pmerguerian2...@yahoo.com>       
  
                                                                               
cc 
                    05/02/2008 07:10          Benoit Nadeau 
<bnad...@matrox.com>, 
                    AM                        EMC-PSTC <emc-p...@ieee.org>      
  
                                                                          
Subject 
                                              Re: Safety regulations            
  
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        If the power supply is an NEC class 2 (vs a class II insulation system) 
or
        an LPS construction, then there is not enough current available to be a
        fire hazard.
        
        Scott
        
        Curt McNamara <mcnam...@umn.edu> wrote:
        What if a short occurred on one of these PCBs? Is there enough flammable
        material to constitute a fire hazard? Could a component get hot enough 
to
        melt connections and drop off, igniting material underneath the product?
        
        As you can see, there may be other cases to consider. Given that an 
event
        could initiate legal action, it may be wise to have a third party verify
        safety.
        
        Curt
        
        On May 1, 2008, at 10:37 PM, peter merguerian wrote:
        
              If the power supply is Listed/Certified Class 2 (power limited
              outputs) and there are no hazardous energy levels, I see no
              problems.
        
              Peter Merguerian
        
        
        
              Benoit Nadeau <bnad...@matrox.com> wrote:
              Bonjour,
        
              I’m much more fluent in EMC than safety and this is why I
              respectfully seek advice in this matter.
        
              I have a question coming from the designers and I’ve been looking 
in
              the US regulations (the NEC mainly) to find the answer but I 
didn’t.
              I think this is more like an interpretation than anything else.
        
              So the question is:
        
              If a PCB manufacturer buys a card cage that includes a fully 
listed
              power supply (approved by UL or CSA or ETL or any NRTL), and stuff
              this cage with his own PCBs (not listed) with no harmful external
              voltages or access to, and resell this as a whole new product. Can
              he put that on the market without having to re-list the new 
product
              as long as the markings on the power supply are still visible from
              outside the box?
        
              For me this would be like having an external Power Supply that 
feeds
              very low voltage to a box (like a laptop computer),
        
              Thank you for the time you are going to take to answer this.
        
              Regards,
        
        
              ==========================================
              Benoit Nadeau, ing. M.ing.
              Gérant du Groupe Conformité (Conformity Group Manager)
              Matrox
              1055 boul. St-Régis
              Dorval (Québec)
              Canada H9P 2T4
              Tél: (514) 822-6000 (2475)
              FAX: (514) 822-6275
              bnad...@matrox.com
              www.matrox.com
              ==========================================
        
              - ----------------------------------------------------------------
              This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
              emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
              To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org
              Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
              List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
              For help, send mail to the list administrators:
              Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org
              For policy questions, send mail to:
              Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com
              All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
              http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        
        
              Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.
              Try it now. -
              ----------------------------------------------------------------
              This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
              emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
              To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org
              Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
              List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
              For help, send mail to the list administrators:
              Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org
              For policy questions, send mail to:
              Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com
              All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
              http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        
        - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
        message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
        discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        
        
        
        Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try 
it
        now. - ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
        discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        
        
        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
        
        
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        
        
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        
        
        Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org
        
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        
        
        Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com
        
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        
        
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
        emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        
        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
        
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        
            Scott Douglas           emcp...@ptcnh.net
            Mike Cantwell           mcantw...@ieee.org
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        
            Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
            David Heald:            emc-p...@daveheald.com
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        
           http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
         
        This message, including any attachments, may contain information that is
confidential and proprietary information of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
The dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message or any of its
attachments is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. - ----
----------------------------------------------------------- This message is
>from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
        For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
        Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 
        For policy questions, send mail to: 
        Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc -
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
        For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
        Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 
        For policy questions, send mail to: 
        Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
        - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This 
message is from the IEEE
Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
        For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
        Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 
        For policy questions, send mail to: 
        Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


________________________________

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http
//mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ>  -
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

Reply via email to