In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 14 May 2008, [email protected] writes:
> >What is the status of the 2006 version of EN 61000-3-2 with regard to >EN 61000-4-7:2002? > EN 61000-3-2 doesn't say anything about the revision of EN 61000-4-7. The whole matter is in the text of 61000-4-7. >I seem to recall that there was discussion of allowing the continued >use of EN 61000-4-7:1993, but I don't know whether or not that is still >an option. It's still an option. See clause 7 of the 2006 edition. You can either use the old instrument or a new instrument set to 5 Hz bandwidth instead of 50 Hz. Of course, if your product passes with 50 Hz bandwidth (and many do) you have no problem. Clause 7 will not be deleted until a satisfactory solution has been developed for certain problems that the use of the 50 Hz bandwidth discloses. It doesn't seem that such a solution will be found soon. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Murphy's Law has now been officially re-named The Certainty Principle John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
