Hi Derek.

A twopence worth perhaps.  I'm sure I'm preaching to the holy.

EMC signatures of switches is a rats nest.  There are so many factors,
contact material, contact mass, spring pressure, local vapour pressure
(especially with mercury wetted), mechanical vibration time constant of the
contact/leaf assembly, snap action, cam action, arc suppression
construction, contact spacing, impedance/inductance/capacitance of the
switched circuits.

You can expect a typical snap action (meaning contact closure/opening speed
controlled by over-centre spring mechanism independent of operator speed)
to bounce a dozen or so time over a period of up to 10mS.  I've had relays
and contactors bouncing for 50mS in a previous life!  If this is a low
voltage low current logic circuit, this corresponds to ten pushes of a
button.  If a high (50V) voltage high current (>100mA) circuit, the
contacts will arc on each bounce if d.c., and cause significant emission
during the arc period, but will be variable arcs on a.c. as the voltage
swings through half a cycle of power frequencies while bouncing.  The
principle is that the transition from short circuit, to Arc voltage
(50v???) is extremely fast and harmonics are generated up to hundreds of
Mhz.

Arcing on cam operated (contacts move at finger speed) contacts is a
nightmare in it's own right.  Slow release of d.c. switches drags out a
significant arc which itself seems to generate wide spectrum noise for as
long as the arc is present (typically 100mS) and occasionally as long as a
second ( or until the contact and holder melt in the case of high current
loads.)  A.c. switching of cam operated contacts has arcs which rarely last
for more than half a cycle of power frequency (10mS UK) due to the self
extinguishing through zero.

It goes without saying I guess, that inductive loads are bad on opening
contacts, and capacitive loads are bad for closing contacts.  But what the
hell, I said it anyway.   Trying to suppress switch bounce arcs with
capacitors is a good way to cause huge GHz transients to rattle round
equipment as the switch shorts out a very low impedance capacitor with
prospective currents up to kA. ( And can in worst case cause contacts to
weld!)  That's why switch suppressor components have series resistors.

If this is a switch that is operated often and quickly, like a trigger on a
games amusement machine,or a Mic switch in an aircraft cockpit, the
emissions can be significant.

Immunity is not normally a problem, but at the far ends of the curve
mercury wetted switches have been known to go short circuit in the presence
of HV transients.  Manual magnet operated Reed switches for logic level
switching were prone to this many years ago on office machines.  Gladly,
RoHS has seen the end of these in service.

Good luck.

Chris Duprés
Compliance Engineer
Elekta Limited
Linac House
Fleming Way
Crawley
West Sussex
RH10 9RR

www.elekta.com
tel:  +44 (0) 1293 654311
fax:  +44 (0) 1293 654260

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



Reply via email to