I am coming to this late, but this is in line with results for LF security devices versus implanted cardiac defibrillator/pacemakers, is it not?
Cortland KA5S > [Original Message] > From: E. Robert Bonsen <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 6/26/2008 5:39:08 PM > Subject: Re: EMC in the news: RFID & Medical > > Published in the Journal of the American Medical Association: > > http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/299/24/2884 > > $15 to download the article. > > > From the summary, no real info on the test process: > > *Design and Setting * Without a patient being connected,^ EMI by 2 RFID > systems (active 125 kHz and passive 868 MHz) was^ assessed under > controlled conditions during May 2006, in the^ proximity of 41 medical > devices (in 17 categories, 22 different^ manufacturers) at the Academic > Medical Centre, University of^ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. > Assessment took place^ according to an international test protocol. > Incidents of EMI^ were classified according to a critical care adverse > events^ scale as hazardous, significant, or light. > > > Regards > --Robert > > E.Robert Bonsen > Sr. Engineer > Orion Scientific - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
