Brian,

At one time there was a Bellcore (pre-Telcordia) standard for 48 hours
burn-in at something like 49C (RH uncontrolled). Nortel used to have
bays and bays of equipment undergoing burn-in due to this requirement.

I have been trying to find that standard for a while without any luck so
a lead would be helpful.

Jeff,

Other than that mythical standard (and perhaps faulty memory), there are
requirements/guidelines for high-temp and temp cycling in GR-468 but
that is only for optical modules.

I've never seen anything outside of the telecom space that *requires*
burn-in. This has always been a cost/benefit analysis of how much
testing will weed out DOA and in-warranty failures. Companies are
certainly free to set their own screens.

...Marko


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian
O'Connell
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:49 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Immunity Failures caused by System Burn-In

Yes, Bellcore/GR-Core/Verizon/SBC/NEBS all have various
reliability standards and requirements, depending on component
type and end-use installation.

luck,
Brian


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
jeff collins
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Immunity Failures caused by System Burn-In

Group,

We have pinned down some immunity failures that are caused by our
system burn-in process, which is rather robust. Are there any
specific Industry standards for the Burn-in of IT or Telecom
electronic equipment?

Thanks in advance!

Jeff Collins
Regulatory Compliance & Reliability

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



CONFIDENTIALITY 
This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail
message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the
sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any
prints thereof.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



Reply via email to