What would be considered worst case? A bicon - log periodic pair, or a bilog
hybrid? I think the less directional the antenna, the worse the uniformity may
be, but, I'm no expert on antennas.
 
Bob R.


--- On Thu, 8/26/10, John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote:



        From: John Woodgate <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: Field Uniformity Calibration per 61000-4-3
        To: [email protected]
        Date: Thursday, August 26, 2010, 2:57 AM
        
        
        In message <1347744851.367114.12827814
[email protected]
<http://us.mc565.mail.yahoo.com/mc/comp
se?to=1347744851.367114.1282781476042.J
[email protected]> 
        .comcast.net>, dated Thu, 26 Aug 2010, [email protected]
<http://us.mc565.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>  writes:
        
        > Shouldn't the chamber user's antenna be used for the field-uniformity 
test?
Otherwise I don't see how the results would apply if a different Tx antenna is
later used. The radiation cahracteristics, including the coupling with the
chamber, will be different.
        
        I think so, too, but there are possibly two stages:
        
        - check the chamber for freedom from non-uniformity [1] using a 
reference
antenna;
        
        - check that acceptable uniformity can be achieved with the user's 
antenna.
        
        [1] e.g. due to one or more quasi-specular reflections.
        -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
        John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
        If at first you don't succeed, delegate.
        But I support unbloated email http://www.asciiribbon.org/
        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <http://us.mc565.mai
.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL.
        
        Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected] <h
tp://us.mc565.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <htt
://us.mc565.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher:  <[email protected] <http:
/us.mc565.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        David Heald: <[email protected] <http:/
us.mc565.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to