In message <1347744851.367114.1282781476042.javamail.r...@sz0149a.emeryville.ca.mail .comcast.net>, dated Thu, 26 Aug 2010, [email protected] writes:
>Shouldn't the chamber user's antenna be used for the field-uniformity >test? Otherwise I don't see how the results would apply if a different >Tx antenna is later used. The radiation cahracteristics, including the >coupling with the chamber, will be different. I think so, too, but there are possibly two stages: - check the chamber for freedom from non-uniformity [1] using a reference antenna; - check that acceptable uniformity can be achieved with the user's antenna. [1] e.g. due to one or more quasi-specular reflections. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK If at first you don't succeed, delegate. But I support unbloated email http://www.asciiribbon.org/ - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
