You may want to reference IEEE C95.1-2005, Standard for Safety Levels with
Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz
to 300 GHz.

This standard is more current than either the ICNIRP or the FCC documents.
It is also more detailed, especially with regard to rationale.

Regards,

dB


Dave Baron, PE
Consulting Engineer
Electromagnetic Field Safety
Austin, TX: 512 917-8346
Minneapolis, MN: 612 568-3416
Fax: 206 203-0605
[email protected]

"Do not use dishonest standards when measuring length, weight, or volume.
Your scales and weights must be accurate."                  Leviticus 19:35






From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sundstrom, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] RI query

I have been told there is no hard and fast rule for the exposure level
(power) as it is frequency dependent. 

I do know that free space (50 feet away) at 30MHz is around 55 watts with
approximately a 3 dB gain antenna ( not in the main lobe of this antenna).
Your location may be different, and this is NOT in a Anechoic or shielded
room. 

KB5UKT
Michael Sundstrom
OHD / TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analist, EMC Lead
2170 French Settelment Rd, Suite B
Dallas, Texas  75212
(214) 579 6312
(940) 390 3644c



From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 7:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] RI query

Try the FCC!

quote:
OET Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997)


Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields 
This revised OET Bulletin 65 has been prepared to provide assistance in
determining whether proposed or existing transmitting facilities,
operations or devices comply with limits for human exposure to
radiofrequency (RF) fields adopted by the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC). The bulletin offers guidelines and suggestions for evaluating
compliance. However, it is not intended to establish mandatory procedures,
and other methods and procedures may be acceptable if based on sound
engineering practice. 
unquote

LINK:  http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/bulletins/

I made reference to it for some testing. Watch your duty cycle!


Cortland Richmond
KA5S


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ron Pickard 
To: [email protected]
Sent: 8/10/2010 9:23:00 PM 
Subject: RI query


[SNIP]
 concern has been floating around here for some time about the hazards to a
human being that would be in close proximity to the generated EMI of a
radiated immunity test. With some products, manual operation manipulation
is needed to exercise portions of the product during this testing, which is
where this question originates. The concern here relates to the
proliferation of cases associated with close proximity to humans and any
legal/ perspectives due confining a human in fully shielded and/or anechoic
chamber during this test.
 
To that end and in the USA, does OSHA impose any restrictions with this
particular type of testing? Are there any maximum permissible exposure
limits for this testing environment? If so, at what field intensity(ies)
will precautions need to be taken

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to