If memory serves, the difference between opt 462 IBW and 3 dB BW was a
factor of 1.5. Meaning that the IBW rating of a filter originally spec'd at
3 dB points was 1.5 times the 3 dB BW.

Now if you can get one of the forum members to apply an impulse generator to
an EMI receiver  with 6 dB BW spec'd, then you will have all the info you
need to know.

 
Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261


> From: Ken Javor <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:15:48 -0500
> To: Untitled <[email protected]>
> Conversation: Spectrum analyzers for MIL-STD-461 CE101?
> Subject: Re: Spectrum analyzers for MIL-STD-461 CE101?
> 
> There are all sorts of spectrum analyzers and receivers out there with
> coverage to 30 Hz. Agilent and R&S readily come to mind.  The HP 8566 Opt 462
> was impulse BWs, not 6 dB.
> 
> The difference between 3 dB and 6 dB BW will only affect BB signals, like
> rectification harmonics. If you know the shape factor of the 3 dB filter
> (Gaussian for the 8566) vs. the 6 dB filter, you can calculate how much extra
> signal the 3 dB BW machine would report over a 6 dB BW machine.
>  
> Ken Javor
> 
> Phone: (256) 650-5261
> 
> 
>> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:58:19 -0700
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Spectrum analyzers for MIL-STD-461 CE101?
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I need to rent a spectrum analyzer for performing MIL-STD-461 CE101 tests.
>>  Although the requirements go down to 30Hz, I only need to start at 100Hz.
>> 
>> After sifting out analyzers with frequency range limits, and those with
>> -3dB IF bandwidth specifications, I keep coming back to the venerable HP
>> 8566B or 8568A with option 462 (bandwidths spec'd at -6dB).
>> 
>> 1) For those who perform this test, what spectrum analyzers do you use?
>> 2) How much different will readings be if I used equipment with -3dB IF
>> bandwidth specs?
>> 
>> TIA,
>> Pat Lawler
>> EMC Engineer
>> SL Power Electronics Corp.
>> 
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
>> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
>> <[email protected]>
>> 
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.
>> 
>> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>> 
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
>> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>> 
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
>> David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to