I may not be able to answer all, but here's some ideas.... 

I would think that all exemptions would have to be in the body of RoHS or WEEE
(as they are linked in scope). Changes to the body would have to occur by
amendment of the Directive or perhaps Council Decisions (depending on the
original legal structure of the directive). A good place for a snapshot of an
original directive and its amendments is
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm. If you go to the left hand "simple
search" item, you will see entry at bottom left for "consolidated text". This
is a unofficial but authoritative rolling up of all amendments to a directive.
There is an entry for RoHS there from Feb of 2010. 

However, directives can also be "recast" under new base numbers. That is
currently underway with WEEE and RoHS. It looks like they will have separate
scopes going forward and RoHS will become a CE marking directive. It continues
to have exemptions. This may be the source of your news of the 2014 extension.
Chasing the developing recast is difficult because you have 3 different
versions that are in flux, the Commission proposal, Parliaments reports and
Councils ideas. 

Regards, 
Lauren Crane 

Applied Materials
america - europe - asia   
Corporate Product EHS 
www.amat.com 

lauren crane (mr.) 
product regulatory analyst 
(t) +1.512.272.6540 
[email protected] 

- external use -

Save paper and trees!  Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail. 



        


Dan Roman <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected] 

06/08/2010 08:43 AM To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
cc
Subject
RE: [PSES] X-radiation shielding and RoHS

        

                                      



Slightly off-topic, but I have always had difficultly navigating through the
RoHS legislation and updates.  I usually start at
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/weee/legis_en.htm, but find the morass
of legislation incomplete (or at least hard to follow).  For example, it is
easy to see where the new exemptions and the banning of Deca-BDE are
documented, but where are extensions of existing exemptions that were up for
review documented?  Case in point, I've heard it widely stated that based on
the TAC review, the exemption for lead in solders for servers and network
infrastructure equipment was extended to 1 August 2014.

Is the lack of legislation removing the exemption the default for the
extension or are extensions documented someplace else that I have not found
yet?

Thanks for any insight,

Dan


From: Fred Townsend [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 3:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] X-radiation shielding and RoHS

Only if applied to gold bricks. 

Fred


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Haynes, Tim
(SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:26 AM
To: John Woodgate; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PSES] X-radiation shielding and RoHS

Hi

Does "Gold Plating" improve the efficiency of the lead shielding? ;-)

Tim 


************************

Tim Haynes 

Electromagnetic Engineering Specialist

SELEX Galileo, A Finmeccanica Company

300 Capability Green

Luton

LU1 3PG 

(Phone () +44 (0) 1582 886239 (Mob )) +44 (0) 7540629920 (Fax  7)+44
(0)1582 795863

(Email *)  [email protected]

www.selexgalileo.com

P Please consider the environment before printing this email. 



There are 10 types of people in the world-those who understand binary
and those who don't. J. Paxman



From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 04 June 2010 21:02
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] X-radiation shielding and RoHS


                   *** WARNING ***

This message has originated outside your organisation,
 either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
     Keep this in mind if you answer this message.


In message <[email protected]>, 
dated Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Nick Williams <[email protected]> 
writes:

>No John, I don't think this is a fair interpretation. In fact my 
>impression from the discussion was that the civil service approach, in 
>this case at least, is to try to ensure the UK implementation consists 
>of the absolute minimum which is required by the Directive.

Good: I'm glad to hear that. We did have a lot of trouble with 
gold-plating 20 years ago or so, so it's about time some enthusiast 
tried it again.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort.
SELEX Galileo Ltd
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex
SS14 3EL
A company registered in England & Wales.  Company no. 02426132
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to