Clearly you will get slightly different answers if using different BWs.  I'm
not sure what the difference between a 3 and 6 dB BW filter is, in terms of
the total noise power underneath the curve. It will depend on the shape
factor of the IF filter.

But the difference between 3 dB, 6 dB and impulse BWs should not make a
whole lot of difference, a couple dB at most. I know that's huge for you
uncertainty types out there, but for those of us in the real world of EMI
testing, a couple dB variation in the ultimate noise floor isn't a big deal
unless it is pushing the noise floor up close to the limit.

That shouldn't be the case, except when a combination of a possibly damaged
receiver and unrealistic limit (Hello, Gert) combine to give you fits.

The question of what BW is the "correct" one to use in this application is
tailor-made for Werner Schaefer. He lives, eats and breathes this stuff.

Werner, where are you?
 
Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261


> From: Brian O'Connell <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:20:51 -0700
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [PSES] Radiated emission testing for automotive at low levels.
> 
> Ken,
> 
> From your explanation, I assume that B = 3dB noise bandwidth.
> 
> Is the BW from the instrument spec, or is from the measurement data ?
> 
> thanks,
> Brian 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Ken Javor
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 11:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Radiated emission testing for automotive at low levels.
> 
> The fundamental equation from statistical thermodynamics is:
> 
> N = kTB,
> 
> where,
> 
> N is noise power in Watts,
> k is Boltzmann¹s constant, which is the ideal gas law constant divided by
> Avogadro¹s number,
> T is temperature in Kelvin units, and
> B is bandwidth in Hz.
> 
> If you work that out at room temperature (298 K) and put it into dBm units,
> you get ­174 dBm in a 1 Hz BW.
>  
> Ken Javor
> 
> Phone: (256) 650-5261
> 
> From: <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:00:53 -0700
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Radiated emission testing for automotive at low levels.
> 
> Ken,  I'm curious about the origin of the  -174dBm.
> _____________________________________
________________________________________
> _______ 
> 
> Ralph McDiarmid  |  Schneider Electric  |  Renewable Energies Business  |
> CANADA  |   Compliance Engineer
> 
> From: Ken Javor <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: 05/26/2010 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Radiated emission testing for automotive at low levels.
> 
> Noise floor (dBm) = -174 dBm + 10*log (BW) + F (dB)
> 
> At room temperature, where F is noise figure.
> 
> If F isn¹t given, but a noise floor is given with a stated BW, then using
the
> above equation, you can get the noise floor at any other BW using:
> 
> Noise floor (dBm) = Noise floor at stated BW (dBm) + 10*log (BW desired/BW
> stated)
> 
> Keep in mind, as someone else noted, that receiver manufacturers often state
> noise floor as ³displayed average noise level.²  That uses video averaging,
> which isn¹t allowable if making a peak detection measurement.  You can add
> about 12 dB for the difference between DANL vs. peak detection, other things
> (BW) equal.
>  
> Ken Javor
> 
> Phone: (256) 650-5261David Heald <[email protected]>
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
> <[email protected]>
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.
> 
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to