In message <5DF40095BBDD4BD1A518F1F8EE4C6440@dell27c5040f40>, dated Mon, 17 May 2010, John Allen <[email protected]> writes:
>I am surprised we have heard nothing from Mr Woodgate on this issue - I >think he has very strong views on the whole PLT issue! My message is already there; you just have to find it! My 'strong view' is that we **need to be clever enough** to make it work (because the economic benefits could be very large) while not compromising wireless communication in the HF band (because that's economically important, too). What isn't at all clever is to pretend that emissions tens of dB above current limits are harmless, and neither is an insistence that those current limits are some sort of natural law that cannot be adapted at all. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
