Just to add to what has already been said.
 
Any reasonably sized transmit antenna gets very inefficient below 80 MHz at
the desired distance of 3m. Sometimes the antenna has to be moved closer to
reduce the power, but then you start getting into the near field. As mentioned
previously, the lower frequencies are conducted in by the cables, so the
conducted immunity standard covers those frequencies and are more repeatable
since cable placement/routing is less of an issue. Mitigation also becomes
easier with conducted immunity since the offending cable is more easily
recognized.
 
The preferred emissions measurement distance for most standards is 10m, so the
frequency range can be extended lower before near field becomes an issue. The
antenna efficiency for emissions is less of an issue, besides the fact that
the corrected noise floor will be a little higher due to the antenna factors
being poor. However, that is factored into the measurement and a pre-amp can
be used to help there. 
 
As for the reciprocity of emissions vs immunity, I don't think we want to have
to scan the antenna height from 1 to 4 meters during an immunity test. :-)
 
Bob Richards.


--- On Tue, 3/9/10, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:




        
        Can someone tell me why the Radiated Immunity testing is conducted from 
80
Mhz to 2 Ghz while Radiated Emissions is conducted from 30 Mhz to 1 Ghz (or
5th harmonic), i.e. why the gap from 30 Mhz to 80 Mhz for Immunity?
         
        Robert Hanson
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL. 
        Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
        David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to