Thanks to all who replied to my email. I was expecting reassurance that my
understanding of this topic, going back some 25 years, still holds true. But
once again, it appears as if things are changing without my knowledge which
really makes for a bad day. I really hate it when I have to tell engineering I
was wrong.

 

Though it appears that using the |/O symbols on switches other than the
disconnect device is a violation of IEC/EN 61010-1 Ed. 2, other standards seem
to contradicts this. Does anyone have a pre-release version of the IEC 61010-1
Ed. 3 to see what it says on this topic?

 

The IEC 60934 standard for Circuit Breaker (including those with switches)
states that the switch must be marked with the |/O symbols. It says nothing
about disconnect device. "For CBEs other than those operated by means of
push-buttons, the open position shall be indicated by the symbol "O" and the
closed position by the symbol "I" (a short vertical straight line).” This is
why our circuit breaker vendor is saying our breakers must have the |/O
symbols regardless of their use. 

 

The following UL60950 Guideline document recommends using the |/O symbols on
ALL switches to show the On/Off position. (thanks to Sylvia for sending this
to me)

 

http://data.ul.com/pagos/access/60950/1783003.asp

 

“UL60950: Per 3.4.8, switches and controls which are considered the main
disconnect device shall be marked "|"/"O". Also, if a switch is located in the
primary and it affects safety, e.g. it controls hazardous moving part, it
shall be marked "|"/"O". Other switches which do not affect safety, including
primary and secondary controls, do not need to be marked "|"/"O", although
this is the preferred method of indicating on and off positions.”

 

So if the |/O symbols can be used on switches other than the Disconnect
Device, then how are you to identify the Disconnect Device?  Is there an
international symbol for Disconnect Device? If not, maybe there should be.

 

Thanks again to all.

The Other Brian

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kunde, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:06 PM
To: emc-pstc
Subject: Use of | and O symbols

 

Reference IEC/EN 61010-1 2nd Ed. Safety Standard. Our product is considered
Laboratory Equipment.

 

The | and O symbols are on our Mains Supply Switch/Breaker which is also our
Disconnect Device, but engineering wants to use additional switch/breakers
(functional purpose) to power on/off different sections of the product.  The
switch/breakers they want to use are breaking AC Mains to sections of the
product and have the  | and O symbols printed right on the switches.

 

It has always been my understanding that the | and O symbols can only be used
on the Disconnect Device which cuts AC mains to the entire product.

 

Can the | and O symbol also be used on other AC Main switch/breakers that cut
AC Mains Supply power to only sections within the product but not the entire
product?  

 

In our case, these additional switch/breaker cut AC mains to circuits but
there are other circuits in the same section that are still powered up.  The
purpose of these additional switches are to power down sections or devices for
power savings at night when some sections of the product need to stay on 24/7.

 

One last detail; all the switch/breaker including the Disconnect Device switch
are all physically mounted on the same panel right next to each other, so I am
concern with the proper identification of the Disconnect Device switch.

 

Other than the | and O symbol, are there other ways to identify the Disconnect
Device switch?

 

The manufacturer of the switch/breakers will not make it without the | and O
symbols without loosing its VDE certification. 

 

I’ve been telling engineering that the | and O symbols can only be used on
the Disconnect Device. Am I wrong?  

 

The standard says, “Symbols | and O shall not be used for switches other
than the power supply switch.”, however, section 5.1.6 says, “If the power
supply switch .. is used as the disconnecting device…”, implies that a
power supply switch does not have to be the Disconnect Device.  

 

Please help clarify this circular logic for me.

 

The Other Brian

 

PS:  Here is the entire section 5.1.6 to use as a referrence:

 

5.1.6 Switches and circuit-breakers

If the power supply switch or circuit-breaker is used as the disconnecting
device, the on-position

or the off-position shall be clearly marked. Symbols 9 and 10 of table 1 can,
in some

cases, also be suitable as the device identification (see 6.11.2.5). A lamp
alone is not

considered to be a satisfactory marking. Symbols 9 and 10 shall not be used
for switches

other than the power supply switch.

 

6.11.3.1 Switches and circuit-breakers

An equipment switch or circuit-breaker employed as a disconnecting device
shall meet the

relevant requirements of IEC 60947-1 and IEC 60947-3 and be suitable for the
application.

If a switch or a circuit-breaker is used as a disconnecting device, it shall
be marked to

indicate this function. If there is only one device – one switch or one
circuit-breaker – symbols

9 and 10 of table 1 are sufficient.

A switch shall not be incorporated in a MAINS supply cord.

A switch or circuit-breaker shall not interrupt a protective earth conductor.

A switch or circuit-breaker with contacts for disconnecting and other contacts
for other

purposes shall conform to the requirements of 6.6 and 6.7 for separation
between circuits.

Conformity is checked by inspection.

 

 

 

 

 

_________________________ 

LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. 

_________________________ 

LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to