In message <9d04b979323dcd428297dda95108893e03a18...@bb-corp-ex2.corp.cubic.cub>, dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, "Price, Edward" <[email protected]> writes:
>he?s expounding on life-and-death reliability, but I get a feeling that >he is getting a bit alarmist. There aren't so many of us in the UK, with the result that one issue tends to gravitate to one person, not a technical community. One person does tend to have to shout very loud in order to be heard. Been there, done that (and received the criticisms for doing so). Keith HAS made an in-depth study of the very difficult subject of the interface between EMI and functional safety. Note, EMI not EMC - conventional EMC thinking is worse than useless in functional safety, because it gives a false sense of security. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
