>Retailers were, and are, concerned about selling products that might have a formally incorrect DoC, not a >fraudulent one. So assurance was sought, and obtained, in terms that a 'year of grace' was reasonable to clear >stocks of product referring to a superseded Directive. That's bad? Does the concept of "placed on the market" determine when the timing might be marked? For example, our distribution center (we still "own" the product) delivers, as in sells, or "places on the market", to a retailer during the time frame of the previous directive, but the retailers distribution and sales to consumers is running slow so that they still have products declared to the old directive but are now in the new directive time frame by any (pick one) length of time. (some of our products have a really long life sitting our shelves for 20+ years until sold.)
- Bill In the event of a national emergency, click on the following links to provide directions to your duly elected mis-representative. http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml or... https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm ________________________________ From: John Woodgate <[email protected]> To: Nick Williams <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Mon, January 4, 2010 3:38:34 PM Subject: Re: Date by which references so old LVD (73/23/EEC) ? In message <p06240813c767f54b4777@[192.168.1.80]>, dated Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Nick Williams <[email protected]> writes: > Access to guidance, informal or otherwise, should not be reliant on membership of some secret sect of experts who happen to be in the know. But we know that in the real world, things are often not like that. And reference to 'a secret sect of experts' is not sensible. People on this mailing list are a sect of experts, but 'secret'? Of course not. Retailers were, and are, concerned about selling products that might have a formally incorrect DoC, not a fraudulent one. So assurance was sought, and obtained, in terms that a 'year of grace' was reasonable to clear stocks of product referring to a superseded Directive. That's bad? -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]> - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]>
