I recall having read that any reference to the old directive will/shall/must be interpreted as being to the new directive....
Gert Gremmen Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens John Woodgate Verzonden: maandag 4 januari 2010 19:42 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: Date by which references so old LVD (73/23/EEC) ? In message <p06240812c767dcb08334@[192.168.1.80]>, dated Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Nick Williams <[email protected]> writes: >Where is this '1 year' written down? What is it about 'informally' that is not clear? When we get unattributable assurances from authorities, there is always someone who wants to see an official document. No way, and such enquires often result in the informal assurances being officially denied, which puts the fertilizer back in the fan. > [snip] > >Certainly, so far as the UK is concerned, there has been no change in >the 1994 Regulations, so any attempt to enforce a requirement to put >2006/95/EC (or, indeed, 73/23/EC) on a declaration would be laughed out >of court. > But that is not relevant. The question was about DoCs that DO have the Directive cited, whether it needs to be or not. In any case, the quoted statement appears to be contrary to Commission document SOGS N506 EN, which includes at item 5 below: QUOTE Declaration of Conformity 1. No: 2. Name and address of (authorised representative of the) manufacturer: 3. This declaration of conformity is issued under the sole responsibility of the manufacturer (or installer): 4. Object of the declaration (identification of product allowing traceability): 5. The object of the declaration described above is in conformity with the essential requirements of directive(s) ……… 6. References to the relevant harmonised standards used, or references to the specifications in relation to which conformity is declared: 7. The notified body ... (name, number)… performed … (description of intervention)… and issued the certificate: …. 8. Additional information: ………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………….. Signed for and on behalf of: …………………………. (place and date of issue) 9. (name, function) (signature) ENDQUOTE -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]> - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
