In message <[email protected]>, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" <[email protected]> writes
>The principles behind GUM are sound. Agreed. >And give workable results without having to invent the wheel yourself. >And are accepted by the international metrology worlds (even if EMC >cannot be really metrologized). Agreed. It's not the science that bugs me, it's the way language is used to put 'gloss' on what are generally non-rigorous processes, i.e. guesses. Informed guesses, usually, but still guesses. -- This is my travelling signature, adding no superfluous mass. John M Woodgate - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
