In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue, 27 Oct 2009, peter merguerian <[email protected]> writes:
> >For EMI, I know the physics tto ebeaches us that CE + CE does NOT equal >CE (i.e. one compliant chassis combined with another compliant chassis >does not assure a compliant combination of the two chassis). I have >war stories to corroborate this. > >Peter: You are 100% correct and I know a few people in this forum whom >I worked with in the past who can attest to this. True, but you have to apply that with insight. If I have four products resting on a shelf, and then I decide to put them in a rack instead, there is no change in the EMC situation, so no additional testing is required. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK Help stamp out intolerance! - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
