In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 28 Oct 2009, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>Not true for identical equipment. > >>Please cite the standard or regulation that supports that opinion. > >If it were valid for a rack of equipment, then that configuration would >have been part of the test standard. Just as all operating modes, all >cable lay-out and all orientations. If multiple equipment in a rack are >not tested it is not to be considered as true. I'm sorry to persist, but this is a very important point. I suppose you agree that I can buy, say, four identical pieces of equipment, with CE mark, DoC and EMC assessment, all in order, put them on a table (even stacked one above another) and operate them without fear of violating anything. If you do agree, what changes when, instead of putting them on a table, I put them into a rack? -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK Help stamp out intolerance! - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
