In message <[email protected]>, Mark Briggs <[email protected]> writes >While I agree that they are product standards - if a more appropriate >product standard contains overlapping requirements then (my opinion) >that standard would take precedence.
Correct, but ... > This is why I think that if your product falls under the scope of a >product-specific standard such as EN 61326 and EN 300 386 that >addresses AC current harmonics and voltage fluctuations you do not need >to apply the 61000-3-2,3 standards as listed in the OJ, only the >requirements of your more-specific product standard. ... there are no such standards, and CENELEC would need an infinite amount of convincing before allowing such a conflicting provision in a product standard. -- This is my travelling signature, adding no superfluous mass. John M Woodgate - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
