In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 9 Sep 2009, "Kunde, Brian" <[email protected]> writes:
> >It should be simple. As Einstein said, 'Things should be a simple as possible, but no simpler.'. Uncertainty simply ISN'T simple, unless you will put up with 'worst-worst-worst' case approximations that may be very tough to handle. >An example for Radiated Emissions, here are the contributors, here is >how you obtain those values, here are the factors for each, do some >math on a spreadsheet and DONE. Look at: http://www.callabmag.com/freeware.html Uncertainty calculator 3.2 has been recommended to me by a REAL expert on the subject. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
