Ed,

take a look at UKAS Lab 34. there is a nice write up in there about MU 
for many EMI tests.

Cheers,

Derek.
www.lfresearch.com
www.emclabservices.com


Brent G DeWitt wrote:
>
> Well said Ken. In addition I think it is worth explaining that not all 
> uncertainty contributions have the same weight, as Ed asked about. 
> This results in a “k” factor that is applied to the contribution 
> towards the total uncertainty. Check out the numerous on-line 
> uncertainty calculators and national guidelines for details.
>
> Brent DeWitt
>
> Westborough, MA
>
> *From:* Ken Javor [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:46 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] Measurement Uncertainty
>
> Since dBs are logs of ratios, you cannot do sums of squares on them, 
> and take square roots. You would have to convert to numerics, do the 
> rss, and then convert back to dBs.
>
> Thus, given your example values:
>
> probe: 0.5 dB is roughly 6% tolerance
> cable: 0.1 dB is roughly 1.1% tolerance
> analyzer: 1 dB is roughly 12% tolerance
>
> RSS: = square root [ (0.06)^2 + (0.011)^2 + (0.12)^2 ] = 0.135
>
> That corresponds to about 1.3 dB overall tolerance.
>
> Note that isn’t very far off from your 1.26 dB answer. However, to get 
> that, you simply added the dB tolerances together (no rss) and then 
> took a square root of the sum of dBs. When you add the dBs together, 
> you are multiplying the tolerances. If you multiply the tolerances and 
> take the cube root, it is as if you are taking a geometric mean. 
> Geometric and arithmetic means are pretty close as long as the factors 
> going into the product don’t vary much from each other.
>
> For instance, if the factors are identical, the geometric and 
> arithmetic means are identical. Of course, that is a degenerate case 
> where the concept of mean isn’t terribly useful. If you had two 
> factors, say one and ten, the geometric mean would be 3.162, whereas 
> the arithmetic mean would be 5.5. If the two factors are one and one 
> hundred, then the geometric mean is ten, and the arithmetic mean is 
> 50.5. You can see where this is going.
>
> Ken Javor
>
> Phone: (256) 650-5261
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Price, Edward" <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:16:09 -0700
> *To: *<[email protected]>
> *Conversation: *Measurement Uncertainty
> *Subject: *Measurement Uncertainty
>
> *A quick question about calculating measurement uncertainty.
> *
> *For example, if I am doing a conducted emission test, and I know the 
> calibration tolerance for each of the "modules" of my measurement 
> system, how do I calculate an overall uncertainty figure?
> *
> *I have been under the assumption that, in the example I cite, that I 
> have a tolerance for my probe (say +/- 0.5 dB), my cable (+/- 0.1 dB) 
> and my analyzer (+/- 1 dB). I have been using an "rms" calculation, 
> where I square each of the tolerances, sum them, and take the square 
> root. Thus, square root of 1.6 dB equals 1.26 dB uncertainty.
> *
> *I recently had a customer say that this method implied that I was 
> using "rectangular" shape factors, and thus, I should be taking the 
> cube root of the sum.
> *
> *Rectangular? Cube root?
> *
>
> */Ed Price
> /**[email protected]* <blocked::mailto:[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected]%3e> * WB6WSN
> **NARTE Certified EMC Engineer
> Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
> Cubic Defense Applications
> San Diego, CA USA
> **858-505-2780
> **/Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty
> /*
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
> e-mail to <[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
> that URL.
>
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
> David Heald <[email protected]>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
> e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
> that URL.
>
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
> e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
> that URL.
>
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to