Dear EMC experts, CISPR 22 (and also CISPR 16-2-1, ANSI C63.4, etc.) requires AMN to be placed 80cm away from the EUT. CISPR 22 now requires that direct plug-in power supply unit to be placed on the tabletop (clause 8.3.1 c)).
To met these requirements for conducted disturbance measurements, extension cord would be required between the AMN and the power supply unit. However, such extension cord would ruin the AMN's carefully defined and validated impedance - the impedance seen from the power supply unit might no longer met the requirements of CISPR 16-1-2. There are pros and cons, and I personally think it would rather better to plug such direct plug-in power supply unit to AMN rather than producing another problems by use of extension cord, but maybe other people may have different opinions. Can anyone tell me how do you, or should we, deal with such situation? Regards, Tom Tomonori Sato <[email protected]> URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/ - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
