In message <1e8310e20735fa4bb42f127880b293e6fee...@acsmail.acs.local>, dated Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Steve O'Steen <steve.ost...@acstestlab.com> writes:
>Wouldn?t it be ideal if the Scope of a standard were to clearly answer >a few basic questions like; who or what is this requirement intended to >protect, why is this protection required and how this standard is >supposed to provide this protection. Yes. If you take part in the standards-making process, you can make sure that 'your' standards do this. Meanwhile, I'll 'steal' your idea and feed it, a bit more generalized, into the standards world, from UK. I will acknowledge you as the source. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
