It is not consistent with quantum mechanics under extreme conditions.  One or
both theories will need to be expanded to resolve this.  In a similar sense
Newtonian mechanics is "wrong" or incomplete because it does not encompass
relativity or QM.



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Javor
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 12:16 PM
To: Untitled
Subject: Re: FTL EMC?

Okay, I'll bite. No knowledge of general relativity beyond that of the
layman, but how can one say it is definitely wrong?
 
Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261


> From: John Woodgate <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:02:56 +0100
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: FTL EMC?
> 
> In message 
> <B41B4B2568C70849A6D5CDDA1C4918CB477F285E6B@GVW1119EXC.americas.hpqcorp.n
> et>, dated Mon, 6 Jul 2009, "Schumacher, Richard (Signal Integrity TSG)"
> <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Somehow I doubt it.  It violates relativity, and news of that device is
>> at least five years old:
> 
> It doesn't violate relativity ,because only a **pattern** moves FTL, not
> any material object. I think it was Asimov or Clarke who pointed out
> that if you have a very long pair of scissors and you close them very
> quickly, the point where the blades cross can reach superluminal speed,
> but the blades do not.
> 
> Not that relativity is sacrosanct. Special relativity is like Euclidean
> geometry, a powerful mathematical concept, but not related to the real
> world. (Euclid isn't true on a quasi-spherical Earth and SR isn't true
> under gravity.)
> 
> General Relativity is definitely wrong, but not by much, probably, and
> no-one knows in what fundamental way or how.
> -- 
> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
> Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
> John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
> <[email protected]>
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.
> 
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to