Hi Reginald,

 

In addition to what Dennis has stated, you might want to also refer to FCC KDB
784748 “784748 D01 Labelling Part 15 18 Guidelines v07” and can be found
>from the FCC KDB search page at http://search.fcc.gov/oetkdb/P/query.html.
Just search for 784748 and you’ll have it.

 

That is a good summary reference on this point and provides a fairly clear
delineation of when/where that FCC mark is applicable.

 

IHTH.

 

Best regards,

 

Ron Pickard

[email protected]

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Ward
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 4:10 PM
To: 'Reginald Henry'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: FCC ** LOGO vs Verification Label RequirementT***

 

By FCC logo I take it that you mean the DoC logo.  If so, the DoC logo only

applies under certain situations and is not for general use.  Typically the

FCC LOGO only applies and can only be used in those instances where the

device can be certified or DoC'd.  The devices that can use the DoC logo are

found in CFR 47 15.101 and include such things as Class B computer

peripheral device (class A cannot use the DoC logo), CB receivers,

Superregenerative receivers, all other receivers subject to part 15

(receiver that tune between 30-960MHz only and which are not verified as

part of a transceiver the transmitter of which is certified), TV interface

devices, cable system terminal device, CPU boards and internal power

supplies used in Class B personal computers, Class B personal computers

assembled using authorized boards and power supplies.

 

No other device is supposed to or should use the DoC logo.

 

Too many times, because of misinformation etc, companies try to put the DoC

logo on digital devices that are not subject to certification or DoC and

Class A computers or other type devices.  For an exact definition of what

can and cannot have the DoC logo you should refer to CFR47 15.101, Subpart J

of part 2 namely 2.906.

 

It should also be noted that testing for DoC must be done not only by an

accredited lab but ONLY by an accredited lab having an MRA with the US or on

US soil.

 

Thanks 

 

Dennis Ward 

Director of Engineering 

American TCB 

Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com 

703-847-4700 fax 703-847-6888 

direct - 703-880-4841 

 

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Reginald

Henry

Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:39 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: FCC ** LOGO vs Verification Label RequirementT***

 

 

All,

 

Every few years I am asked this question.

 

When should the FCC Logo be applied to a product vs. the FCC Statement .

 

As I recall if the product is...

 

1) Meant for commercial use

2) An unintentional radiator

3) tested to be verified ( results of tests NOT maintained by the FCC ) 

   by an independent lab to meet the FCC requirements

 

IF ALL ABOVE IT TRUE THEN... the FCC statement (should be applied to the

product and the manual.

 

 

PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR INPUT ON THIS ?

 

 

Best Regards,

Reg Henry 

Reginald Henry 

Electrical Engineer

Tel: (631) 952-2288    Ext: 310 

Tel: (800) 645-9116    Ext: 310 

Web:  <http://www.vicon-cctv.com/>

 

 

 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may contain information that is

privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure

under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby

notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the

information contained herein (including any reliance thereof) is

strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please

immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in it's

entirety,whether in electronic or hard copy format. The views expressed in

this

communication may not necessarily be the views held by the company. 

Thank you. 

 

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc

discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to

<[email protected]>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that

URL.

 

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas <[email protected]>

Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>

David Heald: <[email protected]>

 

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

 

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas <[email protected]>

Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>

David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to