"We decided..." Whom or what body is 'we' ? Where did you publish this requirement ? What/Whom reviewed and/or approved this numeric ?
"...if the parameter is off by less than +/-5%." What is the physical basis of this percentage ? Applicable to all scalar and vector quantities ? Does this apply to verification and validation ? Percentage of what ? of full scale ? of reading ? of a 'correct' reading ? > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Benoit > Nadeau > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 6:25 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: 10cm above GRP requirement for 61000-4-6 > > Bonjour à Tous, > > Being an A2LA Assessor, I can provide this group insight to > on a common (at > least with this group of Assessors) approach that we adopted > year's ago. > > We decided that when a standard does not provide any > tolerance on a specific > parameter, we shouldn't cite any deficiency if the parameter > is off by less > than +/-5%. > > Regards, > > ========================================== > Benoit Nadeau, ing. M.ing. > Gérant du Groupe Conformité (Conformity Group Manager) > Matrox > 1055 boul. St-Régis > Dorval (Québec) > Canada H9P 2T4 > Tél: (514) 822-6000 (2475) > FAX: (514) 822-6275 > [email protected] - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
