I really want to understand how to properly determine my Measurement
Uncertainty (MU) for the tests our EMC lab performs starting with Radiated
Emissions.  

 

I understand how to do the math but I’m having a hard time nailing down the
Contributions and how to obtain, determine, or test for their proper values. 
I have been working with the UKAS Lab34 document which is very vague when it
comes to this information.  

 

I have seen the MU reports from a couple other labs and I noticed the
Contributions and descriptions are not the same.  I would think for the MU to
have meaning, all labs would have to obtain the information the same way.  

 

So what document or documents describes the nuts-and-bolts to the
Contributions? Which ones do you consider and how do you determine their
value?  If testing is required, how is the test performed?  Is this
information in the CISPR 16-4-2 document? Do I also need sections 4-1 and 4-4?
What other sections do I need to get?

 

I’ll probably have more questions later, but for now I better get the proper
docs and do some more studying.

 

Thanks,

The Other Brian

 

 

 

 

 

_________________________ 

LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to