Hi Wendy,

you have a few responses already. I favor the ETS set personally. 
Regardless of who's probe you buy, make sure you get both E and H probes.

Beware of low cost, you get what you pay for...

Cheers,

Derek Walton

Wendy Nya wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> My company is looking to buy a RF probe set for test bench evaluation for
radiated emission. Can someone give a good recommendation?
>
> PS: I checked the Rohde & Schwarz model - the magnetic loops are too thick
and the price too high.
> Thanks,
> Wendy Nya
>
>
>       
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>   

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to