In message
<of7e5afce7.40bb91cf-on8025796d.0040e621-8025796d.0041c...@selexelsag.com
>, dated Wed, 21 Dec 2011, [email protected] writes:
Why did the writers of 61326 feel it necessary to include reference to
610003-3-2 & 3-3, but the writers of 55022 did not?
The writers of IEC/EN 61326 should not have included the reference,
unless as a note or in an informative annex. it is not correct to claim
to use one standard to enforce another, because that is not in the Scope
of any standard. The writers of CISPR 22/EN 55022 wrote correctly (in
this instance).
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking of
biting a rook.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
