Hi Peter:
Hmm. What's the current status of the ISO 9000 game? Best wishes for the New Year! Rich > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Peter Tarver > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 4:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PSES] Orgalime: UL an "effective barrier to trade" > > > This echoes the hue and cry based on ISO 9000 registration > requirements in > the early '90s. These requirements were placed on the > purchasing side of > businesses. There was quite a bit of noise emanating from the US and > Canada that this was a de facto nontariff trade barrier erected by > protectionists. > > Singling out UL infers customer requirements were probably at play. > > > Regards, > > Peter L. Tarver > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
