In message
<64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB01C53E23@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local>,
dated Wed, 4 Jan 2012, "Kunde, Brian" <[email protected]> writes:
When a customer orders a configuration that does not include the sample
loader (moving part), can we still declare compliance to the MD or in
these cases do we have to generate a different DOC declaring to the
LVD? In this case, would we have to establish a system to produce
custom DOCs for each device produced depending on the options ordered
by the customer?
If the MD does not apply, you can't apply it as a default. You need two
DoCs, one if the MD applies and one if it doesn't.
I can't help you with product variants to which the MD applies. It's
clearly oppressive, but change seems improbable.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking of
biting a rook.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
