In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue,
24 Jan 2012, Brian Oconnell <[email protected]> writes:
One of the things that UL does ok is the recognized molder program.
Removes a huge burden from my shoulders when I buy from a supplier
having a QMMY2 file. Have now had two China factories claim UL costs
are at $10E6 USD per annum, so are dropping factory recognition.
1. Is this cost reality or hyperbole?
2. Has your company had to drop a bobbin and other plastic vendor after
cancellation of their UL file; that is, is this actually common?
Try Mexico or Brazil. Or even REPATRIATE!
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking of
biting a rook.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
