> From: John Woodgate
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 23:58
> In message
> Peter Tarver writes:
>
> >The UK are cosigners to the HAR agreement.  However,
> BS 7671 calls out
> >a number of BS standards for cables, but does not
> mention <HAR> cable.
>
> Any such reference should be in the BS cable standards,
> not in BS 7671.
> >
> >Can <HAR> cables be used in the UK and meet BS 7671?
> What sort of
> >limitations are there?
>
> You have to look at the cable standards. Many <HAR>
> cables are used in UK.

Thank you for replying, John.

This smacks of revenue enhancement on the part of BSI.

>From the above, BS 7671 stating "appropriate British or Harmonized
Standard," in numerous locations is meaningless without buying a
collection of standards and comparing them.

Cheers for your Friday evening.

Peter Tarver


This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended 
recipient, you may not review, use, copy, disclose or distribute this message. 
If you received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply email 
and destroy all copies of the original message. 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to