In message <[email protected]>, dated Fri,
13 Apr 2012, Peter Tarver <[email protected]> writes:
This smacks of revenue enhancement on the part of BSI.
The content of BS 7671 is down to IET, not BSI. I could not possibly
comment on the question of revenue enhancement.
From the above, BS 7671 stating "appropriate British or Harmonized
Standard," in numerous locations is meaningless without buying a
collection of standards and comparing them.
There is a list of such BS in Appendix 1 of BS 7671. If you find a
standard number there, go to the BSI Shop and drill down for details of
the standard, you should be able to find whether it corresponds to an HD
in the <HAR> system.
In Britain, some County Libraries give subscribers free read-only access
to almost all BS.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Every lame duck needs help from Dame Luck.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
