If your company makes a device or component that is used within your customer's 
device or system I highly recommend you design and test your product for the 
best EMC performance you can within reason.

Our company purchases many components, modules, power supplies, controllers, 
etc. from other companies which become part of our products or systems. In the 
world of Laboratory Equipment, because of the much smaller quantities produced, 
this approach is more common than say consumer products. Our EMC lab pre-tests 
almost everything and as a general rule we fail about 50% of what we test for 
either emissions or one of the many immunity tests we run.

Our company just doesn't have the time to fix other people's problems so IF we 
have a choice we will purchase the products with the best EMC performance. If 
we do not have a choice we will try to fix the problem. Because we are a fairly 
small company and don't have a lot of buying power and rarely can get the 
manufacturer to make changes or improvements for us.

We try to be helpful and pass on our failing results to manufacturers. We have 
had several cases where the manufacturers will deny our findings only to return 
a year or so later confessing we were right and promise they have fixed their 
problems and now want to sell to us. Once a company gets a bad reputation we 
will rarely do business with them.

I know this reply is not based on what the law, directives, or standards say, 
but based on a business perspective from one company's point of view.

Hope this is helpful.

The Other Brian


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Wells
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 8:44 PM
To: 'Bob Richards'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: CISPR 11 Question

Bob
Yes I should have tried that approach.
Thanks for pointing it out.
I do have another opportunity in a few months.


Chris Wells

________________________________
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Bob Richards
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 3:45 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CISPR 11 Question


I've had clients request testing the DC input just as we would for AC. It would 
seem to me that if you test the DC input and it passes, then there should be 
little question about compliance.

Bob R.

--- On Sat, 6/16/12, Chris Wells 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

From: Chris Wells 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: CISPR 11 Question
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, June 16, 2012, 7:58 AM
I am facing a similar issue:
I have a 24VDC powered device that needs to meet CISPR 11.
We planned to recommend a particular class B power supply with this device.
However the noise from our device appears to be pushing through the power
supply and limiting the combo to class A.  The problem area is in the 5-30
MHz. range.

So now I need to resolve if the power supply by itself is the issue or if
our device is the culprit.  Radiated wise I can achieve class B with this
combo.

Chris Wells
Eaton Corp

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

________________________________
LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential 
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by 
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to