In the USA, I think there is no law requiring safety approval.
But local AHJ's, authorities having jurisdiction, and insurance providers, etc. 
can require as a business item, that devices are 'approved'
That 'requirement' won't change because it is not regulated by the government.  
Unless we want more laws!
There are plenty of items available that not labelled with an NRTL mark.  And a 
lot with counterfeit marks.



________________________________
 From: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
To: "Pearson, John" <[email protected]> 
Cc: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE Marking Provoqium
 


At least it is a self-declaration process
for safety and for EMC.  In the USA and Canada, you must get product
certified by a 3rd party for product safety.  No option but to drag
a product to a local test house (UL, CSA ETL, etc) and wait for them to
fit you in to their schedule.   I'd like to see the CE mark approach
used here, but unlikely to happen in this century.  
_______________________________________________________________________________

Ralph McDiarmid  |  Schneider Electric   |  Solar
Business  |   CANADA  |   Regulatory
Compliance Engineering 
 



From:  "Pearson, John" <[email protected]>  
To:  [email protected]  
Date:  08/17/2012 07:15 AM  
Subject:  Re: [PSES] CE Marking Provoqium 
________________________________
 


Hi 
  
For the sake of discussion, I would like
to open up for debate the suggestion the EU process is one of the most
unreasonably excessive in the world.   
  
With the exception of China and Brazil
this is the one major region that imposes retrospective recertification
costs due to the introduction of new Safety and EMC standards on an existing
design.  I would like to suggest that the dates of cessation of conformity
impose a requirement to reassess (test if necessary depending on the variance
to the old standard) which achieves little and costs manufacturers 
unnecessarily. 
  
Can we discuss? 
  
Thanks 
  
John 
  
  
John Pearson, Senior Director,
Corporate Product Compliance 
Polycom|Singleton Court Business
Centre, Wonastow Road Ind. Est., Monmouth, UK, NP25 5JA|T: 
+44-(0)1753-723165|M: +44-(0)7968-064105 
  

This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or
confidential informa­tion of Polycom and is intended for a 
specific individual.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this communication, including any attachments without 
reading or saving them in any manner and you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this communication, 
or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
  
  
  
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Sykes, Bob
Sent: 17 August 2012 14:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PSES] EC vs EU suffix 
  
CE = Check Everything or Compliance Expensive.... 
  
...It's Friday 
  
-Bob 
  
-----Original Message----- 
From: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Sundstrom, 
Michael 
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 8:45 AM 
To: Crane, Lauren; [email protected] 
Subject: RE: [PSES] EC vs EU suffix 
  
And here all these years I thought it meant:
Compliance Extraordinary... 
  
  
Michael Sundstrom 
OHD TREQ Dallas 
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead 
(214) 579 6312  office 
(940) 390 3644  cell 
KB5UKT 
  
-----Original Message----- 
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:50 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [PSES] EC vs EU suffix 
  
The CE marking remains the same.  
  
The meaning is 'Caveat Emptor'   ;-) 
  
Regards, 
Lauren Crane 
KLA-Tencor 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 2:44 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [PSES] EC vs EU suffix 
  
Conformité Européenne 
  
-----Original Message----- 
From: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Doug Powell 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 2:30 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [PSES] EC vs EU suffix 
  
  
And the "CE" mark, what happens
to it? 
  
CE = Communauté Européenne 
  
-- 
Thanks, -doug 
  
Douglas E Powell 
[email protected] 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01 
  
  
  
On 8/16/12, [email protected]<[email protected]>
wrote: 
> EU = European Union 
> EC = European Community 
> 
> The Treaty of Lisbon  which came
into force in in December 2009  
> provided 
for 
> the absorption of the entity known
as the European Community  by the  
> European Union. 
> 
> Regards 
> 
> Peter. 
> 
> From: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Scott  
> Xe 
> Sent: 16 August 2012 15:37 
> To: [email protected] 
> Subject: EC vs EU suffix 
> 
> The EU regulations/decisions/directives
published after 2010 have a  
> suffix of EU rather than EC.  Is
there any particular reason for this change? 
> 
> Scott 
  
- 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the
list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> 
  
All emc-pstc postings are archived and
searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 
  
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE
PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/can be 
used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. 
  
Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
  
For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
Scott Douglas <[email protected]> 
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
  
For policy questions, send mail to: 
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]> 
David Heald: <[email protected]> 
  
- 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the
list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> 
  
All emc-pstc postings are archived and
searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 
  
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE
PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/can be 
used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. 
  
Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
  
For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
Scott Douglas <[email protected]> 
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
  
For policy questions, send mail to: 
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]> 
David Heald: <[email protected]> 
  
- 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the
list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> 
  
All emc-pstc postings are archived and
searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 
  
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE
PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/can be 
used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. 
  
Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
  
For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
Scott Douglas <[email protected]> 
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
  
For policy questions, send mail to: 
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]> 
David Heald: <[email protected]> 
  
  
Please be advised that this email may contain
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message.
 The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an
offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that
the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or
other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in
any attachment. 
  
- 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the
list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> 
  
All emc-pstc postings are archived and
searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 
  
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE
PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/can be 
used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. 
  
Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
  
For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
Scott Douglas <[email protected]> 
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
  
For policy questions, send mail to: 
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]> 
David Heald: <[email protected]> 
  

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________ 
-
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected]> 
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the
web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online
Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/can be used for 
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. 
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>  
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>  
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to