On 19 Aug 2012, at 21:37, Bob Johnson wrote: > > This is why the safety of a product needs to be addressed by a product safety > engineer, not an auditor. After careful review of the hazards and conditions > of use, you may end up with a design with either tighter or looser > constraints than the standard, but you should have produced a careful > rationale you feel can stand up to the review of other product safety > engineers.
A near- perfect encapsulation of the application of standards under the CE marking directives. Thank you. With your permission I will use these words in many of my training presentations from now on. Nick. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
